R-tuning

 R tuning:

Large language models (LLMs) often face issues with generating incorrect or hallucinated content. Various methods have been proposed to address this challenge, one of which includes the use of Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) techniques. This paper introduces a novel approach called R-tuning, aimed at teaching LLMs to better handle uncertainty in questions.


They applied a pre-trained model to a dataset composed of questions and their corresponding answers. This dataset was divided into two subsets based on the congruence between the predicted and actual answers:

  • D0: The subset where the model’s prediction does not match the ground truth.
  • D1: The subset where the model’s prediction aligns with the ground truth.

In the D1 subset, where predictions were accurate, they prepended the phrase "I am sure" to the model's responses. Conversely, in the D0 subset, where predictions were incorrect, they used the padding "I am unsure." This method of explicit feedback helps the model learn to express certainty or uncertainty based on the context of the information provided.


The implementation of this R-tuning approach has demonstrated significant improvements over traditional LLM setups. When tested against well-known models such as Llama 7b and Llama 13b, their method showed superior performance on diverse datasets including MMLU, which features multiple-choice questions, and ParaRel, which involves predicting answers. By integrating phrases that indicate confidence, the model not only learns to recognize its own certainty levels but also enhances its reliability by openly expressing uncertainty when appropriate.

This R-tuning strategy marks a promising advance in the development of more reliable and self-aware language models. By enabling LLMs to acknowledge and communicate the certainty of their responses, they can significantly reduce the occurrence of hallucinations and increase the trustworthiness of model-generated content.



paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09677

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Fine Tuning, Prompt Tuning, and Prompt Engineering

  Differences Between Fine Tuning, Prompt Tuning, and Prompt Engineering Fine Tuning : This involves re-training a pre-trained model to adapt it for a specific task. It adjusts the model's weights through additional training, which can require significant computational resources. The entire model is updated to optimize performance for the new task. Prompt Tuning : Unlike fine tuning, prompt tuning involves adding a set of trainable parameters (or soft prompts) to the model’s input without altering the original model’s weights. This approach allows the model to adapt to new tasks while keeping the pre-existing weights fixed, making it less computationally intensive than fine tuning. Prompt Engineering : This method relies entirely on crafting effective input prompts for the model. It does not involve any computational training or modification of model parameters. Prompt engineering is about designing prompts that effectively guide the model to generate the desired output. Two Approa...
Read more

Efficiency in Large Language Model Training: LoRA, Qlora, and Galore

 Training large language models (LLMs) is a resource-intensive process, primarily due to the vast number of parameters involved. Various methods have been developed to improve the efficiency of this process, focusing on reducing memory usage without significantly sacrificing model performance. LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation LoRA (Low-Rank Adaptation) is a technique that introduces two low-rank matrices, A and B, into the training process. This method allows the freezing of pre-trained model weights, thereby reducing the number of trainable parameters. By focusing only on adapting these low-rank matrices, LoRA enables finer model tuning while leveraging existing, well-optimized model architectures. QLoRa: Quantized Low-Rank Adaptation Building on the foundation of LoRA, QLoRa incorporates a 4-bit quantized pre-trained model with low-rank adapters. This approach aims to maintain the efficiency benefits of LoRA while further reducing the memory footprint through quantization. Galore: Gradi...
Read more

KAN: Kolmogrov Arnold Network

 Introducing Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks (KANs): A Novel Approach to Deep Learning Architectures While Multilayer Perceptrons (MLPs) have been foundational to the development of deep learning architectures, their design places activation functions directly on neurons. In thist work, they propose a transformative approach called Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks (KANs), which repositions activation functions from neurons to the connections between them specifically, on the weights. This innovative change is not just a minor tweak but is deeply rooted in mathematical approximation theories. This research demonstrates that KANs offer improved accuracy and interpretability over traditional MLPs. This approach is based on the Kolmogorov-Arnold representation theorem (KART), contrasting sharply with the universal approximation theorem (UAT) that inspires MLPs. While UAT posits that a network cannot achieve infinite accuracy with a fixed width, KART suggests the possibility under certain conditio...
Read more